The article describes local realities and contextual circumstances in Afghanistan which are influencing cooperation on water sharing during dry years. The contribution assesses the performance of multi-stakeholder platforms for water management as a ‘good’ water governance model promoted by the European Union in Afghanistan’s post-civil war environment. Based on interviews with key stakeholders held in 2011-12, and using criteria derived from (a) the new Afghanistan Water Law and (b) MSP literature, especially Verhallen, Warner, and Santbergen (2007), we scrutinize water management and conflict resolution in two sub-basins in North Afghanistan, the Lower Kunduz and the Taloqan, singled out as pilots for the new model, in two very dry years: 2008 and 2011.The article concludes that there is a predictable implementation gap between models and practices. It highlights that 7 years after the introduction of good governance models, water allocation is still driven by what may appear as a darker side of governance. The article questions whether it actually is for the worst, including when it comes to limiting inequity in water access and preventing conflicts.

doi.org/10.7564/14-IJWG64
International Journal of Water Governance

Thomas, V, & Warner, J.F. (2014). River Basin Multi-Stakeholder Platforms: the practice of ‘good water governance’ in Afghanistan. International Journal of Water Governance, 2014(2-3), 105–132. doi:10.7564/14-IJWG64